Justice Thomas on abortion precedent at 1991 confirmation hearing

By | December 4, 2021

Justice Thomas on abortion precedent at 1991 confirmation hearing

1 00:00:00,270 –> 00:00:01,980 >> I would just repeat the question. 2 00:00:03,220 –> 00:00:08,700 >> And do you believe. I’m not asking you to prejudge the case. I’m just asking you whether you believe that 3 00:00:08,700 –> 00:00:14,100 the Constitution protects a woman’s right to choose to terminate her pregnancy. 4 00:00:14,160 –> 00:00:19,770 >> Senator as I noted yesterday and I 5 00:00:19,770 –> 00:00:25,050 think we all feel strongly in this country about the our privacy. I 6 00:00:25,050 –> 00:00:31,590 do. I believe the Constitution protects the right to privacy. And 7 00:00:31,590 –> 00:00:39,300 I have no reason or agenda to prejudge the issue or to predisposed 8 00:00:39,300 –> 00:00:44,820 to rule one way or the other on the issue of abortion which is a difficult issue 9 00:00:44,820 –> 00:00:46,200 . I’m not. And may I see this. 10 00:00:46,200 –> 00:00:52,170 >> Have you made any decision in your own mind whether 11 00:00:52,170 –> 00:00:54,570 you feel Roe vs. Wade was properly decided. 12 00:00:54,570 –> 00:01:00,900 >> Not without staying with that decision as I have not made Senator a 13 00:01:00,900 –> 00:01:06,750 decision one way or the other with respect to that important decision. 14 00:01:06,750 –> 00:01:13,020 >> So you have not you cannot recollect ever making taking 15 00:01:13,020 –> 00:01:18,300 a position where it is properly decided not properly decided and you do not have one here that you would share 16 00:01:18,300 –> 00:01:19,070 with us today. 17 00:01:19,080 –> 00:01:24,450 >> I do not have a position share with you here today on the proper whether or not that case 18 00:01:24,450 –> 00:01:30,600 was properly decided. Senator your question to me was 19 00:01:30,600 –> 00:01:36,150 did I debate the contents of Roe vs. Wade the outcome in Roe vs. 20 00:01:36,150 –> 00:01:41,760 Wade. Do I have this day an opinion a personal opinion on 21 00:01:41,760 –> 00:01:46,880 the outcome in Roe vs. Wade. And my answer to you is that I do not. 22 00:01:47,690 –> 00:01:52,550 >> Well do I understand that you may overrule it or you may sustain it. 23 00:01:52,560 –> 00:01:57,930 >> I have no agenda. Senator I have tried to here as 24 00:01:57,930 –> 00:02:03,570 well as in my other endeavors as a judge to remain impartial to remain open 25 00:02:03,570 –> 00:02:09,000 minded. And I am open minded on this particular important issue. 26 00:02:09,000 –> 00:02:10,650 My time is up. Thank you.